Editorial

Published on 20 October 2025

Rising costs of biologicals: effective cost-containment does not please all stakeholders

Abstract: Rieger and Holland provided a report of a stakeholder meeting dealing with the biosimilar uptake in Australia. The proposed policy measures reported may not have a dramatic effect on the biosimilar uptake. From the scientific and medical point of view, the biotech industry has developed wonderful medicines for treating chronic and life-threatening diseases. Unfortunately,…

Author(s): Adjunct Professor Pekka Kurki, MD, PhD

biosimilars, cost containment, health professionals, substitution, tender

DOI: 10.5639/gabij.2025.1403.014

Sponsored Article

Published on 10 October 2025

Biosimilar trial failed? Investors get their money back: a new insurance model redefines clinical trial financing

Abstract: A new insurance-backed financing model for biosimilars uses AI-powered underwriting to cover clinical trial costs if they fail. This reduces risk, improves capital access, and minimizes equity dilution for developers. Introduction Developing biosimilars has always involved a complex calculus of risk, capital, and time. Now, a newly launched insurance-backed financing model could dramatically change…

Author(s): Tomas J Philipson, PhD, Dhruva Gupta, MD, Jacob Shia, MBA, Rahul Gupta, MD, MPH, MBA, FACP

AI underwriting, biosimilars, clinical trial insurance, drug development financing, non-dilutive capital, risk management

DOI: 10.5639/gabij.2025.1402.011

Original Research

Published on 07 October 2025

Therapeutic equivalence of a formulation of purified micronized flavonoid fraction of diosmin/hesperidin 450 mg/50 mg in healthy adults: an open-label, randomized, single-dose, crossover study

Introduction/Study objectives: Given that the purified micronized flavonoid fraction (diosmin/hesperidin 450 mg/50 mg) is a formulation with low water solubility, granulated form, and low intestinal membrane permeability, the present bioequivalence study was conducted to compare Dipemina® (T: tested) with Daflon® (R: reference product).Methods: A phase I, open-label, randomized, two-period, two-treatment (2x2) crossover study was carried…

Author(s): Katherine Bouyer Sáez, Francisco Fuentes Poblete

bioequivalence, diosmin/hesperidin, purified flavonoid fraction

DOI: 10.5639/gabij.2025.1402.007

Special Report

Published on 06 October 2025

Follow-on biologicals/biosimilars approved in Brazil: September 2025 update

Abstract: In Brazil, the legal framework for approving biosimilars was established in 2010 and the first biosimilar product was approved in 2015. In June 2024, RDC 875 introduced new provisions, including the use of international reference drugs and the possibility of waiving non-clinical and comparative clinical studies under certain conditions. By September 2025, ANVISA had…

Author(s): German Enrique Wassermann, PhD, Sílvia Helena Cestari de Oliveira, MSc

biosimilars, Brazil, clinical studies, regulatory framework

DOI: 10.5639/gabij.2025.1402.008

Editor's Letter

Published on 10 August 2025

A spectrum of generics and biosimilars: research, reports, and interviews

In this second issue of 2025, we have a diverse spectrum of publications which include one original research paper in the generics area and biosimilar-focused articles which comprise one special report, one meeting report, one interview and one sponsored article.  The first article in this issue is an Original Research paper titled ‘Therapeutic equivalence of…

Author(s): Robin Thorpe, PhD, FRCPath

DOI: 10.5639/gabij.2025.1402.006

Interview

Published on 15 April 2025

Turkey’s biotech manufacturing ambitions: Yerlika Biopharma’s strategic role

Abstract:Yerlika Biopharma is a pioneering biotechnology company in Turkey. Company CEO, Hasan Zeytin, MD, PhD, spoke to GaBI (Generics and Biosimilars Initiative) about the company’s strategic focus. Yerlika is dedicated to reducing the country’s dependency on imported biological products through localizing biopharmaceutical production in Turkey. With state-of-the-art manufacturing facilities, the company also aims to expand…

Author(s): GaBI Journal Editor

biopharma, biopharmaceutical, biosimilars, biotech, Turkey

DOI: 10.5639/gabij.2025.1402.010

Meeting Report

Published on 14 April 2025

Current trends in biosimilar uptake and special focus on automatic substitution – a symposium report

Abstract: In December 2023, the University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital (HUS), and University Pharmacy (Yliopiston Apteekki) Helsinki collaborated to present the online symposium titled ‘Current Trends in Biosimilar Uptake and Research with Special Focus on Automatic Substitution’. This provided an overview of global trends in biosimilar use and a systematic examination of the implications…

Author(s): Professor Alan Lyles, BSPharm, MPH, ScD, PhD (h.c.), Heinonen E, MD, PhD, Tolonen HM, MSc (Pharm), PhD, Linden K, MSc (Pharm), MSc (Econ), PhD, Sihvo S, PhD, Sarnola K, MSc (Pharm), MSc (Econ), PhD, Airaksinen M, MSc (Pharm), PhD

affordable medicines, automatic substitution, biological medicines, biosimilar, community pharmacy, Finland

DOI: 10.5639/gabij.2025.1402.009

Editor's Letter

Published on 10 April 2025

Editor’s introduction to the initial issue of the 14th volume of GaBI Journal

In this first issue of 2025, we have some controversial criticism of an article previously published in GaBI Journal [1}, as well as a paper on pricing of biosimilars/biologicals after patent expiry and a meeting report on claimed weakening of FDA regulatory standards for biosimilars and its perceived effects on undermining physician confidence in biosimilar…

Author(s): Robin Thorpe, PhD, FRCPath

DOI: 10.5639/gabij.2025.1401.001

Original Research

Published on 08 April 2025

An analysis of policy impacts on the price developments of biological medicines after patent expiration

Introduction/Study objectives: A biosimilar is a biological medicine that is developed to be similar to an existing biological medicine (the ‘reference medicine’) for which marketing exclusivity rights have expired. The prices of such medicines are shaped by regulations onpharmaceutical pricing, or the policy of setting the price of a medicine at certain points in the…

Author(s): Peter Schneider, MA, Alexander Guggenberger, BSc, MSc, Siegfried Eisenberg, BSc, MSc, PhD, Lukas Rainer, BSc, MSc

biosimilars, cost containment, pharmacoeconomics, policy measure savings, pricing

DOI: 10.5639/gabij.2025.1401.004

Meeting Report

Published on 25 March 2025

Biosimilar Red Tape Elimination Act (S.2305): weakening FDA regulatory standards for biosimilars, undermining physician confidence and jeopardizing patient health

Introduction: In the US, some biosimilars that meet additional requirements may be approved as interchangeable products. This means they can undergo pharmacy-level substitution. An online webinar titled ‘Biosimilar Red Tape Elimination Act (S.2305): Weakening FDA Regulatory Standards for Biosimilars, Undermining Physician Confidence and Jeopardizing Patient Health’, was held to discuss its implications on medicines availability, safety…

Author(s): Michael S Reilly, Esq, Ralph D McKibbin, MD, FACP, FACG, AGAF, Professor Philip J Schneider, MS, FASHP, FASPEN, FFIP, Andrew Spiegel, Esq

interchangeable biosimilar, misinformation, switch studies

DOI: 10.5639/gabij.2025.1401.005

Letters to the Editor

Published on 14 January 2025

Comment on the article ‘Misinformation about interchangeable biosimilars’

Abstract:  The critique of Reilly and McKibben of the meta-analysis conducted by Herndon et al. is factually flawed on several important points. As a result, the conclusions of Reilly and McKibben are not scientifically substantiated. Comment on ‘Misinformation about interchangeable biosimilars undermines US health policy, physician confidence, and patient health’ (GaBI Journal, 2024;13(2):55-60) Dear Editor,…

Author(s): Hillel P Cohen, PhD, Caridad Pontes, MD, PhD, Fernando de Mora, MBA, PhD

biopharmaceutical, critique, interchangeable biosimilar, meta-analysis, misinformation

DOI: 10.5639/gabij.2025.1401.003

Letters to the Editor

Published on 18 December 2024

Comment on the article by Reilly MS and McKibbin RD

Abstract: Reilly and McKibbin oppose the update of FDA interchangeability guidance that does not require clinical switch studies. However, their arguments lack a scientific basis. Comment on the article by Reilly MS and McKibbin RD: Misinformation about interchangeable biosimilars undermines US health policy, physician confidence, and patient health.GaBI Journal, 2024;13(2):55-60. The US Food and Drug…

Author(s): Adjunct Professor Pekka Kurki, MD, PhD

interchangeable biosimilar, misinformation, switch studies

DOI: 10.5639/gabij.2025.1401.002